Students' Scientific Literacy in the third Educational Period

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55707/ds-po.v39i1.120

Keywords:

scientific literacy, primary school students, interest in science, attitudes towards science and technology

Abstract

In the study we wanted to gain a more detailed insight into the scientific literacy of primary school students in the third educational period in Slovenia. In the quantitative research, from 10 randomly selected schools, we included 1 unit of students from each grade of the third educational period, who filled out an anonymous questionnaire about scientific literacy. A total of 513 students were included in the research. We find that primary school students in the third educational period still have very poor ideas about the work of scientists. Students have a positive attitude towards science at school and are aware that science and technology are important to society, but they mostly do not want to become scientists or engineers. It was found that students who have a higher final grade in science or biology have a better idea of what scientists do, have a higher interest in science, and a better attitude towards science at school and towards science and technology in society.

References

Bačnik, A., Slavič Kumer, S., Bah Brglez, E., idr. (2018). Naravoslovna pismenost. Ljubljana: Zavod RS za šolstvo. Dostopno na: https://www.zrss.si/pdf/Naravoslovna_pismenost_gradniki.pdf (pridobljeno 8. 8. 2023).

Bartels, S. in Lederman, J. (2022). What do Elementary Students know about Science, Scientists and how they do their Work?. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 627–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2050487

Blažič, M., Ivanuš Grmek, M., Kramar, M. idr. (2003). Didaktika. Novo mesto: Visokošolsko središče, Inštitut za raziskovalno in razvojno delo.

Bozzato, P., Fabris, M. A. in Longobardi, C. (2021). Gender, Stereotypes and Grade Level in the Draw-a-Scientist Test in Italian Schoolchildren. International Journal of Science Education, 43(16), 2640–2662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1982062

Broderick, N. (2021). Exploring the Impact of Teaching Science through Socioscientific Issues on Upper Primary School Children’s Scientific Literacy: a Multiple-Site Case Study. Doktorska disertacija. Dublin: City University.

Chionas, G. in Emvalotis, A. (2022). Greek Upper Primary Grade Students’ Images About Science and Scientists: An Alternative Descriptive Piece of the Puzzle. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.933288

DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific Literacy: Another Look at its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and its Relationship to Science Education Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L

Drymiotou, I., Constantinou, C. P. in Avraamidou, L. (2021). Enhancing Students’ Interest in Science and Understandings of STEM Careers: the Role of Career-based Scenarios. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1880664

Emvalotis, A. in Koutsianou, A. (2018). Greek Primary School Students’ Images of Scientists and their Work: has anything Changed? Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1366899

Ferguson, S. L. in Lezotte, S. M. (2020). Exploring the State of Science Stereotypes: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of the Draw‐A‐Scientist Checklist. School science and Mathematics, 120(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12382

Ferjan, T. (2003). Ustvarjalnost učencev pri raziskovalnem pouku. Didactica Slovenica – Pedagoška obzorja, 18(2), 116–120.

Fujiwara, Y., Velasco, R. C. L., Jones, L. K. idr. (2022). Competent and Cold: a directed Content Analysis of Warmth and Competence Dimensions to Identify and Categorise Stereotypes of Scientists Portrayed in Meme-Based GIFs. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 694–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2050560

Glažar, A. S. in Devetak, I. (2013). Pouk naravoslovja in naravoslovna pismenost. Didactica Slovenica – Pedagoška obzorja, 28(2), 53–66.

Jukić, R. in Mirosavljević, A. (2019). Kakovostno poučevanje na področju naravoslovja. Didactica Slovenica – Pedagoška obzorja, 34(3–4), 49–65.

Kang, J., Hense, J., Scheersoi, A. idr. (2019). Gender Study on the Relationships between Science Interest and Future Career Perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1534021

Kang, J. in Keinonen, T. (2018). The Efect of Student-Centered Approaches on Students’ Interest and Achievement in Science: Relevant Topic-Based, Open and Guided Inquiry-Based, and Discussion-Based Approaches. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9590-2

Kang, J., Salonen, A., Tolppanen, S. idr. (2021). Effect of Embedded Careers Education in Science Lessons on Students’ Interest, Awareness, and Aspirations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10238-2

Kenneth Jones, L. in Hite, R. L. (2020). Who wants to be a Scientist in South Korea: Assessing Role Model Influences on Korean Students’ Perceptions of Science and Scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 42(16), 2674–2695. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1829158

Lee, S. in Kim, S. H. (2018). Scientific Knowledge and Attitudes toward Science in South Korea: does Knowledge lead to Favorable Attitudes? Science Communication, 40(2), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017753189

Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L. idr. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034

Markuš, N. in Čagran, B. (2017). Primerjava raziskovalnega pristopa s tradicionalnim pri spoznavanju okolja. Didactica Slovenica – Pedagoška obzorja, 32(1), 33–46.

Markuš, N. in Hus, V. (2018). Uveljavljanje raziskovalnega pouka pri predmetu spoznavanje okolja in predmetu družba. Didactica Slovenica – Pedagoška obzorja, 33(1), 18–30.

Martins, I., Baptista, M. in Reis, P. (2023). Students’ Images of STEM Professionals: a Study in the Portuguese Context. Education 3-13, 51(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1955945

NRC - National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington: Washington: National Academies Press.

Newton, P., Driver, R. in Osborne, J. (2004). The Place of Argumentation in the Pedagogy of School Science. V: Gilbert, J. (ur.). The RoutledgeFalmer Reader in Science Education. London: RoutledgeFalmer, 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570

Norris, S. P. in Phillips, L. M. (2003). How Literacy in its Fundamental Sense is Central to Scientific Literacy. Science education, 87(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066

Pavlin, J., Gostinšek Blagotinšek, A. in Krnel D. (2021). Učenje z raziskovanjem in njegovo poučevanje v visokošolskem prostoru. V: Devjak, T. (ur.). Inovativno učenje in poučevanje za kakovostne kariere diplomantov in odlično visoko šolstvo: specialne didaktike v visokošolskem prostoru (str. 29–54). Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta. https://doi.org/10.51746/9789617128215

PISA. (2008). Izhodišča merjenja naravoslovne pismenosti v raziskavi PISA 2006. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut. Dostopno na: https://www.pei.si/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/PISA2006_Izhodisca_Naravoslovna_Pismenost_Dopolnjena.pdf (pridobljeno 18. 8. 2022).

PISA. (2016). Program mednarodne primerjave dosežkov učenk in učencev PISA 2015: naravoslovni, matematični in bralni dosežki slovenskih učenk in učencev v mednarodni primerjavi. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut. Dostopno na: https://www.pei.si/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/PISA2015NacionalnoPorocilo.pdf (pridobljeno 8. 2. 2023).

Program osnovna šola biologija. Učni načrt. (2011). Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport, Zavod RS za šolstvo.

Program osnovna šola fizika. Učni načrt. (2011). Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport, Zavod RS za šolstvo.

Program osnovna šola kemija. Učni načrt. (2011). Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport, Zavod RS za šolstvo.

Program osnovna šola naravoslovje. Učni načrt. (2011). Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport, Zavod RS za šolstvo.

Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific Literacy/Science Literacy. V: Abell, S. K. in Lederman, N. G. (ur.). Handbook of Research on Science Education (str. 729–780). New York: Routledge.

Roberts, D. A. in Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific Literacy, Science Literacy, and Science Education. V: Lederman, N. G. in Abell, S. K. (ur.). Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II (str. 559–572). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267-38

Sadler, T. D. in Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific Literacy, PISA, and Socioscientific Discourse: Assessment for Progressive Aims of Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20327

Scholes, L. in Stahl, G. (2022). ‘I’m Good at Science but I don’t want to be a Scientist’: Australian Primary School Student Stereotypes of Science and Scientists. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(9), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1751316

Schwartz, R. S. in Lederman, N. G. (2002). “It's the Nature of the Beast”: The Influence of Knowledge and Intentions on Learning and Teaching Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10021

Silver, A. in Rushton, B. S. (2008). Primary-School Children's Attitudes Towards Science, Engineering and Technology and their Images of Scientists and Engineers. Education 3-13, 36(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270701576786

Simon, S. in Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ Attitudes to Science. V: Osborne, J. in Dillon, J. (ur.). Good Practice In Science Teaching: What research has to say (str. 238–258). Meidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.

TIMSS. (2016). Mednarodna raziskava trendov znanja matematike in naravoslovja TIMSS 2015 in TIMSS Advanced 2015. Dostopno na: http://timsspei.splet.arnes.si/files/2016/11/TIMSS-2015-povzetki.pdf (pridobljeno 8. 2. 2023).

Trefil, J. in Hazen, R. M. (2010). Scientific Literacy: A modest Proposal. V: Meinwald, V. J. in Hildebrand, J. G. (ur.). Science and the Educated American: A Core Component of Liberal Education (str. 57–69). American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Tytler, R., Osborne, J., Williams, G. idr. (2008). Opening up Pathways: Engagement in STEM across the Primary-Secondary School Transition. Canberra: Australian Department of Education.

Published

2024-06-18

How to Cite

Dolenec, A., & Torkar, G. (2024). Students’ Scientific Literacy in the third Educational Period. Didactica Slovenica, 39(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.55707/ds-po.v39i1.120

Issue

Section

Prispevki