Threshold Concepts in a Changing Educational Context

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55707/ds-po.v40i3-4.197

Keywords:

threshold concepts, liminal state, knowledge transfer, cognitive learning, curricula

Abstract

The paper focuses on the significance of threshold concepts in the educational process, which are essential for understanding advanced ideas and concepts. Understanding these concepts enables students to form deeper and more lasting connections between prior and new knowledge. Threshold concepts emphasize primarily the cognitive aspect of learning, requiring students to pass through a liminal phase of uncertainty, which represents a crucial turning point in their progress. An analysis of primary school curricula (n=17) did not confirm the explicit presence of threshold concepts. The reasons for this include lack of a unified definition, traditional approaches to curriculum design and difficulty of operationalizing these concepts in the learning objectives. The differences in the use of threshold concepts across disciplines are evident –  in natural sciences, they represent conceptual shifts in thinking, in social sciences and humanities, they develop analytical skills, and in language subjects, they emphasize the understanding of linguistic structures. To enhance the teaching of threshold concepts, the paper recommends clearly defining and integrating threshold concepts into curricula, as well as training teachers to recognize and teach these concepts and developing educational materials and pedagogical strategies, such as problem-based learning and reflective thinking.

References

1. Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Ratclifie, M., Sanders, K. in Zander, C. (2007). Threshold concepts in computer science: Do they exist and are they useful? V SIGCSE '07 (str. 504–508). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1227310.1227482

2. Buljubašić Kuzmanović, V. in Gazibara, S. (2016). Evalvacija aktivnega učenja v visokošolskem poučevanju. Didactica Slovenica – Pedagoška obzorja, 31(2), 118–134. https://www.dspo.si/index.php/dspo/issue/view/84

3. Corrigan, P. T. (2019). Threshold concepts in literary studies. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 7(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.1.2

4. Cousin, G. (2006). An introduction to threshold concepts. Planet, 17(1), 4–5. https://doi.org/10.11120/plan.2006.00170004

5. Cvetek, S. (2014). Pražni pojmi in težavno znanje v visokošolskem poučevanju, učenju in kurikulumu. Didactica Slovenica – Pedagoška obzorja, 29(1), 130–142. https://www.dspo.si/index.php/dspo/issue/view/77

6. Davies, P. in Mangan, J. (2007). Threshold concepts and the integration of understanding in economics. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 711–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701685148

7. Flanagan, M. T., Taylor, P. in Meyer, J. H. F. (2010). Compounded thresholds in electrical engineering. V R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer in C. Baillie (ur.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (str. 227–239). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460912078_015

8. Jukić Matić, L., Moslavac Bičvić, D. in Filipov, M. (2020). Značilnosti učinkovitega poučevanja matematike. Didactica Slovenica – Pedagoška obzorja, 35(3-4), 19–37. https://www.dspo.si/index.php/dspo/article/view/28

9. Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J. H. F. in Davies, P. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (3): Implications for course design and evaluation. V C. Rust (ur.), Improving Student Learning—Diversity and inclusivity (str. 53–64). Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

10. Land, R., Meyer, J. H. F. in Baillie, C. (2010). Editors’ preface: Threshold concepts and transformational learning. V R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer in C. Baillie (ur.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (str. I–XXXV). Brill.

11. Land, R., Meyer, J. H. F. in Smith, J. (2008). Threshold concepts within the disciplines.Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460911477

12. Meyer, J. H. F. in Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines. V C. Rust (ur.), Improving student learning theory and practice – 10 years on (str. 412–424). OCSLD.

13. Meyer, J. H. F. in Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49, 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5

14. Meyer, J. H. F. in Land, R. (2006a). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: An introduction. V J. H. F. Meyer in R. Land (ur.), Overcoming barriers to student learning: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (str. 3–18). Routledge.

15. Meyer, J. H. F. in Land, R. (2006b). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Issues of liminality. V J. H. F. Meyer in R. Land (ur.), Overcoming barriers to student learning: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (str. 19–32). Routledge.

16. Nicola-Richmond, K., Pépin, G., Larkin, H. in Taylor, C. (2017). Threshold concepts in higher education: A synthesis of the literature relating to measurement of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1339181

17. Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. Instructional Science, 34(6), 573–595.

18. Pirš, A. (2025). Preizkusi znanja in nacionalna preverjanja znanja iz slovenščine. Didactica Slovenica – Pedagoška obzorja, 39(3-4), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.55707/ds-po.v39i3-4.155

19. Ricketts, A. (2010). Threshold concepts: ‘Loaded’ knowledge or critical education. V J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land in C. Baillie (ur.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (str. 45–60). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460912078_004

20. Ross, P., Taylor, C. E., Hughes, C., Kofod, M., Whitaker, N., Lutze-Mann, L. in Tzioumis, V. (2010). Threshold concepts: Challenging the way we think, teach and learn in biology. V J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land in C. Baillie (ur.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (str. 165–177). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460912078_011

21. Thomas, L., Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Sanders, K. in Zander, C. (2017). In the liminal space: Software design as a threshold skill. Practice and Evidence of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 12, 333–351.

22. Thornton, S. (2020). Threshold concepts in primary school maths and science: An investigation of some underlying ideas of STEM. V A. MacDonald, L. Danaia in S. Murphy (ur.), STEM education across the learning continuum (str. 233–247). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2821-7_13

23. Učni načrt za angleščino kot prvi tuji jezik v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

24. Učni načrt za biologijo v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

25. Učni načrt za domovinsko in državljansko kulturo ter etiko v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

26. Učni načrt za družbo v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

27. Učni načrt za geografijo v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

28. Učni načrt za glasbeno umetnost v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

29. Učni načrt za gospodinjstvo v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

30. Učni načrt za kemijo v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

31. Učni načrt za likovno umetnost v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

32. Učni načrt za matematiko v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

33. Učni načrt za naravoslovje in tehniko v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

34. Učni načrt za naravoslovje v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

35. Učni načrt za slovenščino v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

36. Učni načrt za spoznavanje okolja v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

37. Učni načrt za šport v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

38. Učni načrt za tehniko in tehnologijo v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

39. Učni načrt za zgodovino v osnovni šoli. (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

40. Učni načrt za fiziko v osnovni šoli (2011). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

Published

2025-12-18

How to Cite

Volk, M., & Kukanja Gabrijelčič, M. (2025). Threshold Concepts in a Changing Educational Context. Didactica Slovenica, 40(3-4), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.55707/ds-po.v40i3-4.197

Issue

Section

Prispevki

Most read articles by the same author(s)