Uporaba didaktičnih modelov – vidik učiteljev in učencev
Ključne besede:
aktiven pristop k učenju, pouk, didaktični modeli, šolski kontekstPovzetek
Inovacije pri pouku imajo prioritetno vlogo, uporaba sodobnih vsebin, metod, oblik in sredstev pa predstavlja novo filozofijo vzgoje in izobraževanja. Da bi našli rešitve za potrebe novih generacij, se številni raziskovalci osredotočajo na preučevanje postmodernih družbenih izzivov v izobraževanju. Z raziskavo želimo ugotoviti, kako učitelji in učenci dojemajo uporabo didaktičnih modelov pri pouku. Z uporabo tehnik skaliranja in anketiranja je najlažje odkriti najpogosteje uporabljene modele v praksi. V ta namen smo uporabili Likertovo ocenjevalno lestvica (SUNPIMN), ki vsebuje 30 postavk, ki preučujejo 18 didaktičnih modelov pouka. Raziskavo smo izvedli v Srbiji na vzorcu 325 anketirancev (219 učencev in 106 učiteljev). Rezultati kažejo statistično pomembne razlike v dojemanju učiteljev in učencev, učiteljev družboslovnih in naravoslovnih ved ter učiteljev z različnimi leti delovnih izkušenj.
Literatura
Acosta-Tello, E., Shepherd, C. (2014). Equal Access for All Learners: Differentiation Simplified. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 51–57.
Bachiorri, A., Puglisi, A., Monica, L., Scaffardi, S. (2016). A Local Community and waste Management: the ECO-WAS Project in Traversetolo (Italy). U Lambrechts, W., Hindson, J. (Eds.), Research and Innovation in Educationfor Sustainable Development (pp. 66–79). Environment and School Initiatives.
Brownson, S. (2014). Embedding Social Media Tools in Online Learning Courses. U Cunningham, M., Serdyukov, P., Hill, R. (Eds.). Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching (pp.112–118). CA USA.
Chia-Ling, H., Ya-Fung, C. (2017). Using Large Data to Analyze the Effect of Learning Attitude for Cooperative Learning between the High Achievement Students and the Low Achievement Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 293–296.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Demirci, C. (2006). Fen bilgisi ogretiminde etkin ogrenme yaklasiminin bilgi duzeyi erisiye etkisi. (The effects of the active learning approach in the science studiesr teaching on knowledge level achievement). Egitim ve Bilim, Vol. 31, No. 139, pp. 10–18.
Dorgu, T.E. (2015). Different Teaching Methods: A Panacea for Effective Curriculum Implementation in the Classroom. International Journal of Secondary Education, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 77–87.
Evans-Williams, M. (2017). Technology Integration Support Levels for In-Service Teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 76–81.
Forrest, K., Judd, K.R., Davison, J.R. (2012). Coming to know within healthy uncertainty: an Autoethnography of Engagement and Transformation in undergraduate Education, Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 710–721.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., Wenderoth, M.P. (2014). Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, No. 3, pp. 111, 8410–8415.
Graham, C.R. (2002). Factors for effective learning groups in face-to-face and virtual environments. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 307–319. Retrived on 10.05.2020 from world wide web: https://ger.mercy.edu/index.php/ger/article/view/239.
Kardas, M., Uca, N. (2016). Aktif ogrenme yonteminin kullanildigi calismalarin ogrenci basarisi, tutumu ve gorusler acisindan incelenmes Bir meta-analiz calismasi. Uluslararasi Turk Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 118–130.
Kazlauskiene, A., Gaucaite, R., Poceviciene, R. (2016). Preconditions for Sustainable Changes in Didactics Applying Self-Directed Learning in the General Education School. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 105–118.
Kohanova, I. (2006). Didactical situation in specific conditions. Bratislava: Comenius University.
Kunanbayeva, M.S. (2016). Criteria for Formation of Active Personal Position of School children. International Journal of Environmental Science Education, Vol. 11, No. 13, pp. 5883–5891.
Lambrechts, W., Mulà, I., Ceulemans, K., Molderez, I., Gaeremynck, V. (2013). The Integration of Competences for Sustainable Development in Higher Education: an Analysis of Bachelor Programs in Management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, pp. 65–73.
Martone, N.J. (2015). Using Student-Centric Technology for Educational Change. Review of the book “Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns” by Clayton M. Christensen, Curtis W. Johnson, and Michael B. Horn. Global Education Review, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 143–145.
Matijevic, M., Topolovcan, T. (2017). Multimedijska didaktika. [Multimedia didactics] Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
Memnun, D.S. (2008). Sekizinci sinifta permutasyon ve olasilik konularinin aktif ogrenme ile ogretiminin uygulama duzeyi ogrenci basarisina etkisi. Uludag Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 403–426.
Miller, C.J., Metz, M.J. (2014). A Comparison of Professional-Level faculty and Student Perceptions of Active Learning: its Current use, Effectiveness, and Barriers. Advances in Physiology Education, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 246–252.
Morrison, K. (2008). Educational Philosophy and the Challenge of Complexity Theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 19–34.
Nuuyoma, V. (2017). The Group-based Assessment Approach in Nursing Education: The Perspective of Nursing Students on Group-based Assessment Process at a Namibian University. International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 91–98.
OECD (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrived on 10.05.2020 from world wide web: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en.
OECD (2018). Teaching in Focus #21. What does innovation in pedagogy look like? Retrived on 10.05.2020 from world wide web: https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/inee/dam/jcr:2b273b3e-8a33-44da-868e e0f60600486f/tif %2021.pdf.
Orak, S., Demirci, C. (2018). Application examples and student views on active learning approach integrated with branches of art. Journal of Educational Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 53–65.
Pedagoski leksikon [Pedagogical lexicon] (1996). Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
Peterson, A. (2018). Combinations of pedagogies, innovative and established. U Burns, T. Paniagua, A. (Eds.), Understanding Innovative Pedagogies: Key themes to analyse new Approaches to Teaching and Learning (pp. 33–57). Directorate for Education and Skills.
Salazar E.R., Eduardo Obaya A.V., Giammatteo, L., Vargas-Rodríguez, Y. (2019). Evaluating a Didactic Strategy to Promote Atomic Models Learning in High School Students through Hake´s Method. International Journal of Education and Research, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 293–312.
Scafa, O. (2014). Heuristically Oriented Systems of Problems in Teaching Mathematics. U Cunningham, M., Serdyukov, P., Hill, R. (Eds.), Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching (pp. 85–91). CA USA.
Sieberer-Nagler, K. (2016). Effective Classroom-Management Positive Teaching. English Language Teaching, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 163–172.
Stanković, Z., Blažič, M. (2017). Position and role of multimedia in a multi-factor model of teaching. Didactica Slovenica – Pedagoška obzorja. Vol. 32, No. 3–4, pp. 46–60.
Stanković, Z., Stanojević, D. (2019). Didaktičke inovacije u teoriji i nastavnoj praksi. [Didactic innovations in theory and teaching practice.] Niš: Filozofski fakultet u Nišu.
Telli, A., Yildirim, H.I., Sensoy, O., Yalcin, N. (2004). Ilkogretim yedinci siniflarda basit makineler konusunun ogretiminde laboratuar yonteminin ogrenci basarisina etkisi. Gazi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 291–305.
Terhart, E. (2001). Metode poučavanja i učenja. Zagreb: Educa.
Vilotijevic, N., Mandic, M. (2016). Informatičko-razvijajuća nastava u efikasnoj školi. [Information-developmental teaching in an efficient school]. Beograd: Srpska akademija obrazovanja.
Wen-Ling, S., Chun-Yen, T. (2017). Students’ Perception of a Flipped Classroom Approach to Facilitating Online Project-based Learning in Marketing Research Courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 32–49.
Yukhimenko, A.N., Mefodeva, M.A., Belyaeva, E.A., Grigorieva, L.L. (2017). Interactive Teaching Methods as means of Stimulating Reserves of Student Interaction. International Journal of Scientific Study, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 58–62.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2023 Jelena Maksimović, Zoran Stanković, Jelena Osmanović
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
